Most casts submitted to dental labs for fabrication of removable partial dentures lack designs or design prescriptions. An approach to partial denture design is presented and a RPD design sequence is proposed. Issues related to position of rests, selection and design of major connectors, minor connectors, denture base connectors, and retainers are discussed.
Designing Removable Partial Dentures – Planning Sequence for RPD Patients — Course Transcript
- 1. Designing RPD’s Planning sequence for RPD patients Ting Ling Chang DDSDivision of Advanced Prosthodontics, Biomaterials and Hospital Dentistry UCLA School of DentistryThis program of instruction is protected by copyright ©. No portion ofthis program of instruction may be reproduced, recorded or transferredby any means electronic, digital, photographic, mechanical etc., or byany information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission.
- 2. Designing RPD’s Planning sequence for RPD patientsv Diagnostic assessment and preliminary impressionsv Diagnostic casts mounted in centric relationv Draw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v Survey the study casts and determine the most advantageous position (MAP) of the designed RPD path of insertion and withdrawalv Revise and finalize the RPD design
- 3. Designing RPD’s Planning sequence for RPD patientsv Diagnostic casts mounted in centric relation
- 4. Designing RPD Frameworks Draw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs.v Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planningv Abutment, arch and occlusal criteriav The application of design principles and philosophyv A knowledge and appreciation of RPD biomechanics
- 5. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers
- 6. Mandibular Design Issues of concernv Proximal Plates – include 2.0 mm of mucosal coverage. Reduce if visible and non-esthetic.v Minor Connectors to Rests – The vertical components to the rests should be at least 5.0 mm apart to reduce food entrapment. Consider lingual plate if closer.v Denture Base Connectors – v Retention of the resin saddle. v Must be short of movable tissues. v Should have relief. v Allow spot metal seating check on master cast. Connectors are placed toward the lingual to prevent impingement
- 7. Mandibular RPD Design Issues of concernv The major connectors may not impinge upon movable soft tissues such as frenum, or vestibular areas.v Superior horizontal components must be clear of marginal gingival tissue edge by 3.0 mm or consider lingual plate.v The lingual borders of the plate or bar may need to be physiologically molded for the final impression/master cast.v Finishing lines between the metal and resin must be marked.v Relief is commonly utilized under the major connectors.
- 8. Maxillary RPD Design Issues of concernv Relief is not commonly used under maxillary major connectors.v Design components should not impinge on soft tissues (soft palate, vibrating line areas).v Beadings or pressure seals are used on major connectorsv Proximal plates – guide planes designed to include 2.0 mm of mucosal tissue coverage. Reduce if esthetic areas involved.v Denture base connectors – short of movable tissues. Should have relief (22 gauge). Allow for spot metal seating contact for fit verification.
- 9. Mandibular RPD Design Optionsv Occlusal rests v Mesial or Distal v Trans-occlusal v Cingulum rest v Incisal rest (direct support or indirect retainer)v Major connectors v Lingual bar v Lingual platev Retainers v “I” bar v Cast circumferential clasps v Wrought wire clasps
- 10. Maxillary Design OptionsOcclusal Rests v Mesial or Distal v Trans-occlusal v Cingulum v Circular concaveMajor Connectors v Full Palatal Coverage v Anterior-posterior (A-P) Strap v Anterior Palatal Strap v Tran-palatal or Posterior Palatal Strap v Other
- 11. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers
- 12. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers Issues of ImportanceRests v Center of the tooth for molars-tooth- borne v Open for cingulum v Easy to check proper seating v Easy to clean v Short of transverse ridge for premolars v Incisal rest should extend onto the labial surface v Ball and socket type to allow pure rotation
- 13. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers OptionsMajor connectors-Mandible v Lingual bar v Lingual plateMajor Connectors-Maxilla v Full Palatal Coverage v Anterior-posterior (A-P) Strap v Anterior Palatal Strap v Tran-palatal or Posterior Palatal Strap
- 14. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers Issues of ImportanceMajor Connectors-Maxilla v Must be rigid v Beadings or pressure seals are used on major connectors v Must be short of the vibrating line v Must extend to the lingual side of the hamular notch
- 15. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers Issues of ImportanceMajor connectors-Mandible v The major connector must not impinge upon movable soft tissues such as frenum, or vestibular areas. v Must be of sufficient bulk to ensure rigidity v Relief is commonly utilized under the major connectors. v On the tooth borne side of the mandible the major connector forms the inferior border of the prosthesis
- 16. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers Issues of Importancev Proximal plate must extend 2 mm onto the tissuesv Minor connectors must cross the ginigival margins at a 90 degree anglev Space between the vertical portions of minor connectors should be 4-5 mm.v Space between the horizontal portions ofmajor connectors and ginvival margin should b 3-4 mm
- 17. RPD Design Sequence v Rests v Major Connectors v Minor Connectors v Denture Base Connectors v Retainers Issues of Importancev Should not impair the placement of denture teethv In the maxilla should not cover the tuberosityv Should be positioned on the crest of the ridge and on the lingual sidev Should enhance the rigidity of the RPD framework
- 18. RPD Design Sequencev Restsv Major Connectorsv Minor Connectorsv Denture Base Connectorsv Retainers Issues of Importancev The horizontal extension of the “I” bar retainer should be at least 2-3 mm from the gingival marginv The vertical portion of the “I” bar retainer must cross the gingival margin at a 90 degree anglev The “I” bar retainer must engage the abutment tooth at the greatest point of mesial distal curvature
- 19. RPD Design Sequencev Completed preliminary design
- 20. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design sequence v Rests v Major connector v Minor connectors v Denture base retainers v Retainers
- 21. The Basic Requirements of a Direct Retainer A properly designed direct retainer (clasp) assembly should provide:v Supportv Stabilizationv Reciprocationv Encirclementv Passivityv Retention
- 22. The Basic Requirements of a Direct Retainer A properly designed direct retainer (clasp) assembly should provide:v Supportv Stabilizationv Reciprocationv Encirclementv Passivityv Retention
- 23. The Basic Requirements of a Direct Retainer A properly designed direct retainer (clasp) assembly should provide:v Supportv Stabilizationv Reciprocationv Encirclementv Passivityv Retention
- 24. The Basic Requirements of a Direct Retainer A properly designed direct retainer (clasp) assembly should provide:v Supportv Stabilizationv Reciprocationv Encirclementv Passivityv Retention
- 25. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design Issues Why did we use a lingual plate in this case?v Status of potential abutments v Endodontic status v Periodontal statusv Rests v Cingulum v Circular concavev Palatal connector v Presence of large torus v Periodontal statusv Retainers v Size of teeth v Angulation of teeth
- 26. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design Issues v Why no lingual plate in this patient?v Status of potential abutments v When an anterior palatal strap is used what design factors need to be kept in mind? v Endodontic status v Periodontal statusv Rests v Cingulum v Circular concavev Palatal connector v Presence of large torus v Periodontal statusv Retainers v Size of teeth v Angulation of teeth
- 27. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics. v What would you do if the premolarsDesign Issues presented with a 60:40 crown root ratio? v How would your design change if the 2ndv Status of potential abutments premolars had been endodontically treated? v Endodontic status v Periodontal statusv Rests v Cingulum v Circular concavev Palatal connector v Presence of large torus v Periodontal statusv Retainers v Size of teeth v Angulation of teeth
- 28. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design Issues v Why did we use a circumferentialv Status of potential abutments clasp on the molar v Endodontic status v Periodontal statusv Rests v Cingulum v Circular concavev Palatal connector v Presence of large torus v Periodontal statusv Retainers v Size of teeth v Angulation of teeth
- 29. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics. v What are the special needs of thisDesign Issues patient? Retention, stability or support?v Status of potential abutments v What if the left cuspid was an v Endodontic status overdenture abutment? How would this v Periodontal status change your design?v Rests v Cingulum v Circular concavev Major connectorv Retainers v Size of teeth v Angulation of teeth
- 30. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics. v Why the circumferential clasp onDesign Issues the premolar rather than an “I” bar?v Status of potential abutments v Why incisal rests rather than v Endodontic status cingulum rests? v Periodontal status v Why lingual plate rather thanv Rests lingual bar? v Cingulum v Circular concavev Major connectorv Retainers v Size of teeth v Angulation of teeth
- 31. Important Points for Unilateral Extensions:Proximal Plates (Guide Planes) and Minor Connectors are PARALLEL. What role is played by the rest on the premolar?“Options on Tooth-borne Side: v Molars are better abutments than premolars. v May need C-clasp (tilted tooth, etc.) v Buccal Reciprocation is Crucial.
- 32. Lab Prescriptions Good Design Prescriptions will have -v Sharp, smooth outlines in identical colorv Design outlines proportionately drawnv Bead seals clearly markedv Retention areas indicatedv Guide plane tissue contacts markedv Resin – metal finish lines clearly marked
- 33. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design sequence v Rests v Major connector v Minor connectors v Denture base retainers v Retainers
- 34. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design sequence v Rests v Major connector v Minor connectors v Denture base retainers v Retainers
- 35. The Basic Requirements of a Direct Retainer A properly designed direct retainer (clasp) assembly should provide:v Supportv Stabilizationv Reciprocationv Encirclementv Passivityv Retention
- 36. Lab Prescriptions Good Design Prescriptions will havev Sharp, smooth outlines in identical colorv Design outlines proportionately drawnv Bead seals clearly markedv Retention areas indicatedv Guide plane tissue contacts markedv Resin – metal finish lines clearly marked
- 37. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design sequence v Rests v Major connector v Minor connectors v Denture base retainers v Retainers
- 38. Designing RPD FrameworksDraw the ideal RPD design (on paper)v There are no classic designs. Any design is a product of diagnosis, treatment planning, abutment, arch and occlusal criteria, with the application of design principles and philosophy and an appreciation of RPD biomechanics.Design sequence v Rests v Major connector v Minor connectors v Denture base retainers v Retainers
- 39. RPD Design Exercise Clean, smooth and legibleDesigns must: v Specify retention v Bead seals clear marked v Resin–metal finish lines clearly marked v Sharp, smooth outlines in identical color v Design outlines proportionately drawn v Guide plane tissue contact area clearly marked
- 40. Laboratory Prescriptionv Rx must be clearly definedv Clearances and anatomic concerns markedv Specify retentionv Specify materials to be usedv Special Requests v Evaluation of Wax-up on Refractory v Inclusion of PFM restoration on Master Cast
- 41. Clean and legible Good Design Prescriptions will have:v Sharp, smooth outlines in identical colorv Design outlines proportionately drawnv Lightly shade relief areas in light redv Retention areas marked in heavy redv Guide plane tissue contacts markedv Resin – metal finish lines clearly marked
- 42. Ability of Major Connectors to Provide Rigidity and SupportMajor Connector Support RigidityPalatal strap good to excellent good to excellentAnterior-posterior strap good excellentComplete palatal plate excellent excellentAnterior-posterior palatal bar poor goodPalatal bar poor poorHorseshoe (anterior strap) poor poorLingual bar poor goodLingual plate poor good to excellent
- 43. Design PrinciplesList Major Connector Criteria: 1. Rigidity 2. Functional 3. Anatomic 4. Physiologic
- 44. Anterior Edentulous Spacev Consider Esthetic Area of Visibility.v Consider Rotational Path Design Option.v Consider Fixed Prosthodontic Optionv Consider implant option.
- 45. v Visitffofr.org for hundreds of additional lectures on Complete Dentures, Implant Dentistry, Removable Partial Dentures, Esthetic Dentistry and Maxillofacial Prosthetics.v The lectures are free.v Our objective is to create the best and most comprehensive online programs of instruction in Prosthodontics